Thank you for your response and clarifications. It appears that I still know nothing about my own power or non-dual thinking, and I have not yet established any contact with my soul or monad that would allow me to acknowledge that they are one with me.
A century ago, Theosophists postulated in their writings that the ultimate goal of humanity is the attainment of total harmony—the unification of the monad, the ego, and the personality. According to them, the life force flowing through these three aspects is the only true reality, while the personality, the soul, and even the monad are merely illusory veils obscuring that divine life. Their works—supported by the efforts of the White Brotherhood and drawing upon Hindu and Indian traditions—significantly brought the concept of human triplicity closer to people, a motif that, in fact, appears in many religions. Regrettably, influenced by certain prevailing trends, the Theosophists focused exclusively on the positive aspects of the subtle planes, thereby overlooking the complex issues of evil, manipulation, and parasitism that operate within those higher spheres.
Our research, conducted between 2007 and 2013, expanded upon certain concepts of Rudolf Steiner and the Theosophists, refuted others, and—above all—clarified the tripartite division of our being, adapting it to a contemporary recipient. Consequently, the formulation subtle self – soul – monad became our foundation.
When we began to explore the subject of the Theosophical Ego — manifesting within the causal body (which, to us, signifies the self-aware soul) — and introduced concepts regarding various kinds of souls — concepts that had been embraced by various circles, particularly in the works of Leszek Żądło’s (Past Life Regression), the reaction from the spiritual community was cold. Until that point, spirituality had been treated as a “hard line”—detached from the subject of the soul and focused instead on the development of an “indivisible personal self.”
The true difficulty lay in how to define the soul: should it be understood as the three lower bodies of man—the etheric, astral, and mental ones—along with the activity of the astral body, with which one can interact? Or perhaps as the ego within the causal body, the Higher Self of Huna, or the “I-There” described by Robert Monroe?
The current trend toward simplification and infantilization within spirituality and esotericism can be partially attributed to the former Theosophist Alice Bailey, who—albeit unwittingly—contributed through her teachings to the emergence of the New Age movement. This movement is characterized by a blurring of terminology and a simplified approach designed to appeal to the widest possible audience. Many individuals interested in spirituality conflate it with the New Age, failing to recognize the distinction between the two. Spirituality is a science—characterized by precise terminology and, above all, a connection with one’s own physical and spiritual bodies—whereas the New Age constitutes a broad and often ill-defined current. This deliberate blurring and dilution of concepts was a stratagem devised by dark forces; for, following the public disclosure of esoteric knowledge by the Theosophists, it became imperative to introduce falsehoods and divert attention away from the subject of the soul.
Naturally, Rudolf Steiner—as the founder of Anthroposophy—much like Helena Blavatsky, the co-founder of the Theosophical Society, was under the strong influence of Lucifer. The reason this influence was not immediately apparent lies in the fact that Lucifer yielded to the power of the White Brotherhood, which was guided by several archangelic souls—including Metatron, John (known from the Book of Revelation), and Sandalphon (Metatron’s other half, who in a later incarnation was recognized as Jesus). Lucifer was compelled to step aside—though only a single step—for as the representative of his own distinct path of enlightenment and development, and as a spiritual force in his own right, he invariably maintained a degree of cooperation with the other souls and archangels. It was the White Brotherhood—together with various masters of Guru Yoga—that, in a sense, shielded certain theosophists from the machinations of the Luciferian reptilians, entities that constantly interfered in spiritual topics and research, distorting and blocking them.
When Alice Bailey was expelled from the Society, her organization’s original name was the “Lucifer Trust”; however, she quickly changed it to the “Lucis Trust” due to the negative associations it held among the uninitiated. Thus began the origins of the New Age movement and the process of the infantilization of spiritual development. This is, of course, a highly simplified description.
Is this why the last hundred years have not brought humanity any closer to its soul—the ego within the causal body, the Higher Self, the “I-There”—but have instead led to an even greater distance? This is because a spiritual shallowness has set in, accompanied by an infantilization and an even more profound severance of the personality from the soul. Although my work has been published since 2007—when I wrote my first article titled “The Difference Between the Subconscious, the Soul, and the Monad”—it never seemed to possess the energy of „momentum,” as if it were perpetually waiting for that force to arrive. What proved most fascinating were always the subtle sensations accompanying the publication of groundbreaking content—topics such as contact with the soul, the various types of souls, the distinction between the subtle self and the soul, the subtle reconstruction of the soul and monad, or the different kinds of love. The events unfolding around me—and within the energetic field of this planet—generated intense tension. It was not merely individuals, fanatics, or various spiritual paths that exerted pressure, launched attacks, and sought to discredit me; these were also egregores—artificial, astral constructs woven from human thoughts and emotions—literally bore down upon me, for the emergence of anything new, distinct, or extraordinary disrupted the established order. It also happened, on occasion, that the energy of the text—of the entire message and the underlying thoughts—was distorted by Reptilians and Greys; consequently, the reader would fail to grasp anything at all, despite the language itself being correct.
The energy of a text is the foundation of my work; for beyond the words themselves, it inspires, reveals, portrays, and carries; it stimulates, yet also serves as a reminder of what is possible and accessible to everyone. During attacks, cut-offs, and overlays, synaptic atoms remain unstimulated, and nothing happens. Therefore—when reading any text, not just mine—it is worth saying to yourself inwardly: “I withdraw whatever here is foreign—whatever does not belong to the author or their space.”
As for Jesus, however—no, I most emphatically disagree that he belongs to the Anunnaki or Archons.
An Archon is an administrator, and that is precisely what the Anunnaki are. Above all, one should not view the Anunnaki as entirely evil—nor, for that matter, all the souls that incarnated into that civilization (or “race,” which seems to be the more accurate term). The Anunnaki come from the era when Orion was at war with the Pleiades, having witnessed the clash between the dark forces (under the influence of Lucifer and Belial) and the white forces (under the influence of the White Brotherhood, the White One, and other beings holding utopian ideals).
How did the later Earth project come about? It came into being as a result of a decision made by the monads—those whose souls chose to incarnate within the bodies (the race) of the Anunnaki. Initially, everything unfolded exactly as expected, for the primary objective was to bring about a convergence of diverse viewpoints, currents, and kinds of souls within a unified human form. The monads’ intention was to reconcile forces that—from Universe to Universe, from world to world—had previously been unable to coexist, which invariably led to conflict and death. The souls incarnating into the physical race of the Anunnaki, however, remained unaware of the monads’ plan.
The Anunnaki themselves lost their power over the planet long ago, even though they laid the foundations for its civilizations. Let’s think about why this happened. Let us imagine a parent (a Supraaspect or Monad) and their child (a soul or incarnation)—a child who lies, manipulates, exploits, plays god, places themselves on a pedestal, and even programs other parents or children who are just beginning their own adventures. What does a parent do in such a situation? They seek a solution. I described this in an article titled “Speculative Fiction: On the History of the Worlds of Our Souls”. Let us take a look at the worlds depicted in television series… (continued below).
- Babylon 5. We have Sheridan (Peter) and Delenn (Mary), as well as Marcus Cole (Jesus) and Lorien (John), maintaining the balance in this Universe.
- Battlestar Galactica. We have William Adama (Archangel Michael), President Roslin (Mary), Lee Adama (Peter), Dr. Gaius Baltar (Jesus), Kara Thrace (Lilith/Yavanna), Number Six (Mary Magdalene/MM), and Cavil (Metatron).
- The Bleach anime. We have: Aizen (Satan) pitted against Genryusai Yamamoto (Archangel Michael). Standing alongside the Commander-in-Chief are the Captains: Urahara (John), Yoruichi (Lilith/Yavanna), Ukitake (Sandalphon/Jesus), Unohana (Mary), Ichimaru (Archangel Gabriel), Mayuri Kurotsuchi (RA), and Kyōraku (Judas/Leviathan).
- The Anunnaki. We have Enki (Sandalphon), Enlil (Metatron), Ninhursag (Lilith/Yavanna), and Sin/Nanna (Me).
Unfortunately, I cannot recall the rest, as I lost my hard drives in 2019 (during the Reconstructions).
Every being journeys from Universe to Universe, from world to world, constantly learning something new. The old guard—whom I call the “Gang of Twelve”—repeated the same pattern of behavior. The Shadow of the Gods was significant, for it was only the process described in this book that broke—or, to put it more gently, shattered—the abovementioned beings.
Earth is unique because here we encounter a collective subconscious forged by the oldest beings—a realm of their patterns and archetypes. Consequently, what draws their souls to Earth are unfinished stories. Fortunately, as of 2026, this process has come to an end. What does any of this have to do with the rest of us? That remains a puzzle; after all, we landed on a planetary “minefield,” and most of us are still picking our jaws up off the floor in sheer disbelief. Yet, this can be interpreted in a different light: what was it that brought us here? What patterns, beliefs, energies, or ideologies?
Little is said about the Anunnaki, although thanks to Sumerian tablets, we know what transpired—or perhaps even less than we might assume. However, we have gained significantly more insight through working with souls and conversing with them—a practice not to be confused with mindless channeling. The greatest among the Anunnaki never returned home; instead, they began to incarnate here, continuing to establish their order—though now within bodies of their own creation. It must have been a painful experience—oh, how it hurt. During that era, most of these beings emanated a soul vibration of Archangelic origin—a distinct lineage, as we know, created by the White One, to whom—while on the cross—none other than Jesus (that is, Enki) offered his prayers.
I believe that he is a primordial being who came into existence even before the creation of the first Universe—and, consequently, before the fallen angel. I cannot conceive, nor do I understand, how his monad or soul could ever harbor a craving for power or engage in the role of an egregore.
A craving for power is something only a person who doesn’t have it can have. These beings (the Anunnaki) were almost invariably born into wealthy lineages, wielding power by the very fact of their existence, for their strength derived from the advanced development of every one of their subtle bodies, as well as their soul and monad. Here is an example illustrating the varying sizes of monads:
Most beings originating from this Universe possess monads ranging in size from 4 to 6. In such cases, the connection between the monad and the soul is minimal. The soul is often unaware of the monad, and the monad does not participate in the soul’s processes or objectives.
The term “fallen angel” is catchy, yet largely inaccurate. We are dealing solely with Descending Beings and Ascending Beings, as everything is predicated upon experience. Some beings “descend” into progressively lower subtle densities, while others—through experience—ascend toward higher spheres, evolving upward from the lowest forms.
The terms “narcissism” and “megalomania” are familiar to many, yet I would like to add this: when you become an icon—worshipped by billions of beings, serving as a symbol of the divine son, and, moreover, receiving billions of quanta of energy directed at you by the faithful—does this not leave a mark on the psyche? Is all of this normal? Not necessarily. First, you focus attention upon yourself; second, you strip other beings of their agency; and third, there has never been such a thing as original sin. Instead of handing someone a fishing rod, you become the rod yourself. Is this healthy? There are studies concerning the brain chemistry of individuals who wield various forms of power and control.
An egregore is the product of prayers and the grouping of people into religious collectives. It is blocked, yet programmed, energy. An egregore exerts influence upon the subtle bodies until the individual breaks free and renounces the specific path of belief or religious affiliation. During this process of liberation, a sense of sheer terror often arises; this is because an egregore possesses neither personality nor consciousness—it merely reacts to the loss of a “member.” This applies to all religions, major philosophical systems—including Buddhism—as well as cults and online discussion forums. Every region of the world possesses its own distinct egregore. No single entity creates egregores; rather, they emerge in accordance with the principle that “like attracts like.”
Of even greater significance are the religious seals and vows made during various sacraments or rituals. We may carry within us the archetype of the Cross, or internal programs such as: “If you are not with the white ones, you are evil/dark”; “You shall not question the teachings of Jesus and his apostles”; or “On every plane of existence, you shall carry the Word of God.” These are real programs within many beings. And yet, if we are dealing with love and freedom, what are they doing in our bodies?
Confronting a being whom—through our upbringing, doctrines, and the community in which we lived—we treated as a master, a god, a deity, a messiah, or an enlightened one is no easy task. At first, we do not see clearly. We begin by stripping away the image of perfection, then that of the father figure, and finally, the sense of being chosen. It is a difficult process, for admitting to oneself—a challenge that weighs particularly heavily on the soul—that one placed one’s faith in someone who was never truly a god or a deity requires admitting to a mistake. Who is ready for that?
I remember a story involving two women and Vishwananda (a Hindu guru). A key element of their work was the restoration of their relationship with their biological father; for, in the absence of that father, their brains had placed a complete stranger upon a pedestal instead. Only once this biological programming had been brought into balance could work on the subtle levels commence. Similarly, priests, Brahmins, and Sufis can replace the absent father, acting as authority figures. In this way, our inner child draws patterns of masculinity and fatherhood from third parties. Likewise, nuns can stand in for an absent mother, while the Virgin Mary herself may serve as an unattainable ideal of woman, mother, and nurturer.
To regain contact with our true selves, we must accept and embrace our parents—regardless of who they were or how they behaved—for psychological transference and projection constitute one of the greatest pitfalls in spirituality. The phrase “God the Father—God the Son” exerts such a profound influence on the human psyche because the brain possesses a biological reference for it. This is a great danger—yet a clever stratagem devised by the whites ones.
I invite you to read the second part of this study On the Anunnaki, Jesus, and Development from a Spiritual Perspective—or How to Activate Your Inner Compass (Part 2).
Nikodem Marszałek
March 2023 / 2026
