David Hawkins calibrated Jesus’s level of consciousness at 1000—the level of an avatar; it is difficult to comprehend how he could be a being of the caliber of Lucifer—someone who once turned toward the better but fell in other incarnations.
One of the consequences of humans possessing a reptilian brain is an energy-conservation mechanism; this ancient part of the brain “constantly assumes” that the body is at risk of running out of energy—that food or shelter might become scarce, or that immediate flight might be required. Consequently, rather than engaging in physical activity, taking action, expending energy, or actively exploring and observing, a person switches—this is done by the limbic system — it puts one into 'x’, '1′, reflexive state, meaning a person starts reacting on autopilot. This system in the body loves all kinds of authorities, gurus, and professors, because according to it, these individuals have already invested their time and energy — meaning they have sacrificed their own resources to explore a given topic, issue, or to conquer a certain territory. This, in turn, allows other individuals to conserve their own energy.
Unfortunately, there is an effect here that sustains the prolonged reflexive state in the other individuals, which translates into automatic, mindless behaviour under partial hypnosis. Therefore, we must learn to literally “switch over” to state “2” or “c”—derived from the English word reflective—which signifies a contemplative mode (slow, rational, and cognitive). Operating in state “x”—that is, the fast, automatic, and mindless mode—rarely yields a solution, though it does allow us to avoid effort of any kind. Another consequence of the reptilian brain is a mechanism of submission to stronger individuals, authority figures, or a specific energetic vibration. This occurs due to the influence of melam—an emanation worn by the Anunnaki like a garment or a crown, from which radiated light and a powerful vibration. Our ancestors succumbed to this vibration; their knees would buckle and their heads would bow in submission. Let us make use of the reflective system.
This is yet another appeal to external authorities and gurus. Why? What exactly did this individual investigate? The energies of Christ—that is, an energetic collective—or perhaps the soul of Jesus, which is referred to in the Torah as Sandalphon? Or did he perhaps examine the egregore of Jesus—the cumulative effect of the prayers of billions of Christians? Or did he, as a white master himself, simply empower another white master, and everything remained within the same collective? And who, precisely, conducted this investigation? Was it his soul, or was it he himself operating on the subtle plane? I addressed Hawkins’s scale in my study “Spirituality, esotericism, New Age – is this already development or fairy tales? Shrouds, Scales, Guardians, the Pleiadians, the Akashic Records, Part 3.”and here I quote:
“The Hawkins kinesiology scale has become popular recently. Every time I see someone create it, I’m surprised — firstly, that they created another scale, and secondly, that other people have entered into this person’s belief system. Leszek Żądło created his own ERD (in Polish: Etap Rozwoju Duchowego) scale, which stood for Stage of Spiritual Development. It ranged from 0 to 36, and a score of 36 meant enlightenment. On the Cudownyportal (in English: the Miraculous Portal) forum in 2008, Leszek was asked a question: „If your scale signifies the merging of consciousness with the higher self (superconsciousness), i.e., enlightenment, what happens if this higher self constantly develops and grows in consciousness?” In one question, he questioned the validity of such a study, because the entire scale was based on the principle of the constancy and perfection of the higher self. You take what you need, discard the rest. And then practice comes and all your ideas crumble into dust. You have to be ready for that, too.”
Growth requires learning to select what we need at any given moment, but also listening to that which within us resists new information. We must observe ourselves and our own reactions, remaining conscious of them. What good is it if we hold a certain belief in our minds, yet our bodies—or reality itself—suggest otherwise? We constantly watch to see whether it is a subconscious pattern, a vow, a seal, the ego, or a guardian that is struggling within us—or if, in fact, it is the voice of intuition. Distinguishing one from the other is not easy at first, but that is precisely what growth is all about, isn’t it?
In his research, Rudolf Steiner equated Jesus and Lucifer, writing that they were once brothers—though this was prior to the latter’s “fall”. Hence the figures of Vishnu and Shiva in Hinduism. In my own work, I refer to this phenomenon differently. Sandalphon and Lucifer are beings that separated from the Source at roughly the same time; their monads shaped their archangelic souls upon a similar tree of souls. It would be difficult to claim that they belong to the exact same wave of emanation from the Source, and they are certainly not brothers in any sense—rather, at that particular stage of existence, they possessed a similar kind of soul, which evolves over time as both the soul and the monad grow with every subsequent incarnation and experience.
In any case, it would be disheartening for me to lose yet another spiritual authority—to believe that Jesus is an Anunnaki, and then to look upon people praising Jesus as if they were idiots. Incidentally, even New Age consciousness movements—such as PrepareForChange, WeLoveMassMeditation, or Cobra from 2012portal—regard Jesus (or Sananda) as an Ascended Master. If what you are saying is true, it would be the greatest scam of all eternity, about as sensible as siding with either the PO or PiS parties, under the delusion that they are trying to destroy the opposition, when in reality they are both playing for the same team.
In the previous part, I mentioned that the Anunnaki should not be viewed as entirely evil, as that represents only one side of the coin. Several defense mechanisms can be observed coming into play—specifically denial and rationalization; these are normal and natural psychological reactions to information that conflicts with the belief system established over the course of a lifetime (and indeed, many lifetimes on this planet). In such instances, the subconscious directs the body to enter a fight-or-flight mode. Interestingly, however, the physiological reaction to this conflicting information remains unchanged—sooner or later, we will be compelled to confront our own emotions. And this, too, is a crucial point: the confrontation is not with the information itself, but rather with the emotion inextricably linked to it.
When a peasant—whose primary interest lay in land to cultivate—was drawn into the political sphere, he was at a certain point offered the illusion of choice and influence. The ”divide et impera” principle — divide and rule — has always been known in politics.
More importantly, the post once again refers to websites, groups and movements. How does this differ from religious beliefs? “They say this; they believe that; these are the messages, the currents, the beliefs.” So many people subscribe to this. Well, then. Had I thought the same way back in 2007—that is, had I believed everything being presented at the time in esotericism, spirituality, and even therapeutic definitions—I would likely have done everything in my power to become “enlightened,” rather than becoming conscious of myself, my soul, and my monad.
It’s a pity I can’t do anything about this, because I am unable to create a reality in which Jesus was an Anunnaki. I suppose I am too bound to this spacetime.
A simple solution: change the connotations associated with the term “Anunnaki.”
It is good to be loyal to—and deeply connected with—a particular belief, fantasy, or mythology, or the structures that others have built. Yet, at a certain stage, the child leaves home and begins to live life on their own terms; they see what the world looks like beyond their own backyard. It is a more difficult situation when, due to developmental disturbances during adolescence—a time when one is just beginning to discover the world—one’s thoughts constantly revert to what one’s parents failed to provide. Such a person is not truly free, for they either demand from others precisely what they never received at home, or they simply repeat the very behaviors that were inflicted upon them. Carl Gustav Jung said that humanity is at the developmental level of a child, which is why it requires authority, law, and guidance.
Our beliefs and opinions regarding myths, legends, saints, and exalted figures—individuals who are not even physically present in our lives—hold absolutely no significance. This activity does nothing to make us safer; rather, it disables our own apparatus, our inner compass, and switches us into “x”, reflexive system. We feel secure because the archetype of perfection acts like a lighthouse illuminating the darkness; yet, as I mentioned in the previous section, we are the light—we craft the fishing rod for ourselves. Our task is to develop ourselves, not to focus on who did what or whether someone is this way or that. None of this alters anything in our own lives. Indeed, one of the defining characteristics of life on this planet is precisely this collision of our own imaginings and fantasies with reality—or with the descriptions and opinions of others. Such a confrontation with archetypes and icons fosters the development of the buddhic and atmic bodies. It is a pivotal stage—a moment of growth within the entire existence of a young or dependent soul.
All in all, I’m not sure whether I believe you or not regarding Jesus, but I do regret having read it—that this information even reached me in the first place. I don’t know; maybe I’ll check with… to see what she sees in Jesus, and until then, I’ll reserve judgment.
On Earth—as an integral part of humanity’s evolution—we are influenced by the collective subconscious and by archetypes; furthermore, our psyche is shaped by the superego, which holds ingrained moral patterns and values—essentially about how to live within a society. Naturally, figures such as Jesus, Buddha, numerous saints and enlightened beings, and even contemporary Hindu avatars are revered as gods—as perfect human beings who have lived or are currently living among us. The existence of such an “ideal” is crucial for the advancement of humanity, as it “drives” individuals to strive for greater perfection. However, at a certain stage, submitting to this collective mindset is no longer necessary; indeed, it becomes fundamentally restrictive to one’s development, for it entails placing a person—or an entity, or even a mere myth—who remains unknown to us, above ourselves and our own discernment.
The next stage of development begins the moment the moral compass—an external compass based on the guidance of a guru, a master, or a seer—shifts to become an internal compass, an inner driving force. Until one has passed through the phase of rebellion—of opposition to the person upon whom one is dependent, or whom one has placed on a pedestal—it is difficult to speak of maturity, for it is merely a weeping child speaking through us. It is easy to imagine what would have happened had we, back in 2007, succumbed to the teachings of Leszek Żądło or the prevailing esoteric thought of that time. We can disagree with someone while simultaneously maintaining respect for that person—even a sense of camaraderie. This, too, is the result of a certain ease, flexibility, and openness—the capacity for collaboration. We simply take what we need, without immersing ourselves, drowning, or losing ourselves—for such an attitude is, unfortunately, precisely what religions and nearly all Eastern spiritual paths have historically demanded. Intellectual reflections—contemplation regarding the nature of the world—is an external aspect, one that is particularly necessary at the outset; subsequently, however, there arises a need to delve into oneself arises — that is, to discover, explore, and release what we find within ourselves, within our own history.
It is also necessary to distinguish between Jesus and Christ. Christ represents an initiation—a specific collection of energy with a certain vibration. In other words, Jesus is a name, while Christ is the name for an initiation. The New Age community, without engaging in deeper inquiry, asserts that Christ represents “Christ Consciousness.” There are many people in the world whom, upon seeing, we might exclaim: “Oh, how much he resembles Jesus!” But why do people say this, given that they have never actually seen Jesus? The reason is that the archetype of this being—as a perfect entity “enveloped” in the energies of Christ—is imprinted within the collective consciousness of humanity. More importantly, over the course of two thousand years, billions of Christians have left behind a massive energetic imprint through their mental imagery, prayers, and fantasies. Detaching oneself from such a construct requires substantial effort because, as I have mentioned, it is intertwined with the mechanisms of the superego and the collective subconscious, as well as the ancestral karma we inherit. The collective subconscious, ancestral karma—all of this constitutes part of the Matrix.
Let us return to this visual resemblance. Why do so many people say that a certain individual looks like Jesus? Is it merely because of their long hair and beard? No; rather, these individuals bear—or carry within themselves—the initiations of Christ. Jesus is the name of a specific incarnation of his soul—a soul that, following that particular lifetime, may well have had subsequent ones. And even if the soul did experience further incarnations—that is, lived on Earth again—people did not perceive her as Jesus at all; this was because the personality did not bear the active initiations of Christ, meaning the soul, while inhabiting a human body, lived vibrating with—or emanating—her own primordial, natural energies.
The very initiation into Christ was invented by another archangel, known as John of the Apocalypse. It was he, too, who developed the White Brotherhood. All of these are white masters. When one looks at a figure such as El Morya, one perceives the initiation into Christ; similarly, this applies to the masters associated with the Theosophists, or to this gentleman here. This raises the question: “How is it that beings of different kinds of souls—possessing such different vibrations and personal emanations—share a similar vibration?” It is because they carry the unifying initiation into Christ.
The New Age movement in particular—but this way of thinking has also reflected in spirituality and even in the esoteric environment—separating Jesus from the Christian religion. And that is a mistake, for it is like trying to separate the Buddha from Buddhism. To Christians, Jesus is God—or at least, that is how the scriptures of that faith portray him. Why, then, within the contexts of spirituality or esotericism, is he treated as an ascended master, god, or an enlightened being? The same kind of thinking and reasoning ought to be applied to Buddha or Muhammad, yet this is not the case in the world. This situation arose because, as the forces of the world fragmented and dismantled the Christian religion, people abandoned the Church—they walked away from it—yet they never truly liberated themselves, mentally, from the religious mindset. Consequently, dogmatic religious expressions suddenly re-emerged as dogmatic spiritual expressions; in other words, the individual remains under the influence of the very same belief system.
Example:
- Jesus loves you – The Universe supports you.
- I pray for you – I send you love / I send you white light.
- God will provide for you – The Universe is infinite and will take care of you.
- It was always about getting into Heaven – It was always about returning to Oneness.
- Sin – Karma.
- Salvation – Enlightenment.
- Jesus – good – Satan – evil.
This is precisely what dualism is. As the saying goes, “It takes two to tango.” What I am presenting is a way out of this type of thinking—out of this hamster wheel. My book, Beyond Duality, breaks this down into its absolute fundamentals.
Conclusion
Therefore, when we read spiritual or esoteric works—even my own—we filter the content, accepting certain things while rejecting others, at least for the time being. This prevents us from getting stuck or dismissing the entire text or viewpoint we are reading, as we continue to verify and test it. On the spiritual path, one must not get bogged down in intellectual contemplations, disputes, or arguments; instead, there must be work on oneself—real, tangible work that awakens our dormant senses, facilitates a deeper connection with our inner selves, teaches us how to connect and communicate with ourselves, and perhaps even enables a connection with the soul. At that point, the things the intellect once defended cease to matter; for as a practitioner, you simply operate, observe, verify, and possess tangible proof—a subtle, lived experience. I recently had an interesting month. Several people came to see me—individuals who had been reading my work for years but with whom I had never worked directly. After each in-person meeting, deeply moved, they would say: “Only now do I truly feel what you write about, what you say, and what this is all really about.” A written text or a published session is intended merely to stimulate, inspire, and provoke thought; it is not a guidebook, a training course, or a substitute for one’s own lived subtle experience—for, after all, many things are simply not visible.
Furthermore, in the contemporary spiritual landscape, there has unfortunately emerged an excess of various theorists—intellectuals devoid of practical skills. The same phenomenon occurred within the realms of personal development and motivation, where corporate and management training sessions were conducted by individuals who had done nothing more than read a few dozen books on management. Listening to these people, one could literally sense a dry, intellectual gibberish— a script learned by heart and honed to perfection, derived solely from the mental level, containing not an ounce of personal experience or practical application. Yet corporations paid for it anyway, simply because it generated billable expenses and was widely popular. The last ten years in the spiritual sphere have similarly abounded with esotericists, clairvoyants, experts, and spiritual coaches of every stripe—individuals who speak on a subject merely because they read about it, yet whose words are backed by absolutely no practical application, discernment, or genuine insight. These individuals are charismatic; they possess impeccable marketing skills, frequently quote various figures—myself included—and project powerful energetic shrouds surrounding their subtle bodies, riding this wave of popularity for all it’s worth. That is precisely why the inner compass I write about is so vital: it enables us to sift through the noise—to see and distinguish the theorists from the true practitioners. It allows you to place your trust in yourself, rather than in external trappings, marketing hype, or the crowds of followers surrounding a particular figure—groups that often generate buzz and manufacture additional interest. Wisdom is in silence.
I will repeat this once more. The highest-ranking Anunnaki possess souls and monads that are fully individualized across twelve densities. Some were completely restructured during the process described in The Shadow of the Gods and The Twilight of the Gods; others, through their own patterns, are learning new values for themselves—without the divine prism. Yet, despite all this—what business is it of ours? Why do we concern ourselves with others? Is it merely an escape from what needs to be cleaned up within ourselves?
Nearly sixty percent of the sessions I conduct focus on interpersonal relationships, romantic partnerships, work, career advancement, management, and resolving various everyday issues—such as relationships with parents, working with one’s family lineage, and unblocking the flow of energy. Working on precisely these types of challenges allows me to tangibly demonstrate the practical application of spiritual knowledge in daily life. The remaining percentage involves working on external interferences, negative influences, and the repercussions of improper spiritual practices. The rest consists of sessions dedicated to the soul and the monad, though always in relation to the personality. After all, spirituality encompasses not merely the soul and the subtle bodies—it is, in fact, the entirety of our lives.
Let’s take a moment for a brief personal summary. How much time have we devoted to studying the history of deities, entities, gods, influences, various theories, and predictions about what the future holds? And now, let us consider how much time we have invested in ourselves—in exploring ourselves and our own personal history? There is nothing selfish about an attitude of self-care—of attending to oneself, working on oneself, and nurturing one’s own essence—for no god, deity, or priest can do any of this for us. Unfortunately, the reptilian brain believed these fairy tales, and the reflexive system puts the body to sleep, convincing it that simply seeing or reading something is almost the same as having done it oneself. It is not. Rise up and begin to live, to think, and to prioritize yourself—along with your own assessment of the situation—above all else; yet, listen attentively, observe closely, and draw your own conclusions. It may not be easy at first, but over time, it will become your nature—because you are the captain of your own ship, and you are constantly creating yourself.
Nikodem Marszałek
March 2023
